How much time do you spend reading emails that are of no interest to you because you were part of a "reply all"? Well, if your numbers are similar to the average you are spending a good 5 percent or more of your workday opening and reading such emails. Beyond being annoyed that you just received the fifteenth "reply all" response to an email on whether staff prefer chocolate or vanilla ice cream for the office party, opening these emails puts a dent in productivity. Considering that approximately 15 percent of your day is spent on email that 5 percent can really add up. "Spread those stats over a 10,000-employee company and you rapidly get to a pretty big number in terms of dollar cost- in the tens of millions of dollars per year" according to
Bloomberg Businessweek article
Re: Re: Re: Confidential.
Some companies are taking drastic measures to combat the time waste (and interrupted concentration) that all those unwanted emails results in. Wells Fargo's sales division head, Gene Sellers, decided that he was tired of it all and pronounced the "reply all" button dead to his staff. The button is forboden and may only be used in special circumstances that involve the staff as a whole.
Netmanners.com suggests users utilize Bcc to remove the option of "reply all" from the receivers of your message.
From my experience I can tell you that the majority of the "repy all" messages I have been on the receiving end of were due to simple carelessness. These were instances were the sender was not paying attention, distracted, or just wanted to get the message out of their inbox. Taking a moment to review, not only your response, but who you are responding to can save much aggravation and possibly avoid some nasty repercussions (for those not too nice griping emails).